Smart Takes on Finance Automation | The onPhase Blog

The Controller’s Playbook for Faster, Cleaner Audits

Written by onPhase | Dec 3, 2025 5:43:59 PM

January’s audit squeeze

January isn’t when audit season starts; it’s when your team will dive into the books under a tight deadline. Accruals get a second look. Past approvals get questioned, and every answer needs evidence that holds up. 

When approvals live in inboxes and support is scattered across drives, a simple request turns into a hunt. Fees creep up. Confidence dips. You don’t need a big project to change that. A few steady habits turn most audit asks into same-day work with complete, defensible support. 

That’s where AP automation earns its keep: policy-backed workflows keep approvals on the record, intelligent capture reduces rekeying and flags field errors up front, and documents travel with the work. 

The problem: why audits eat time 


Here’s the pattern most teams recognize. An invoice gets forwarded for “quick review,” a side thread opens for context, and someone replies “approved” from a mobile account with no detail. By payment time there are two versions and no single decision of record, so AP holds it. A discount slips. The close tightens. Everyone feels the squeeze. 

It isn’t carelessness. It’s a sign that decisions are happening outside the system of record. Once audit season arrives, those gaps show up as hours on the clock. 

Now layer in a real request.  

On Monday morning, a Prepared-by-Client list lands and the auditor samples 25 AP items. Approvals live in email. PO match is in the ERP. Receiving is on a shared drive. The vendor bank change that was verified last quarter never made it onto the transaction record. 

One quick follow-up becomes another thread, then another. A single unclear approval widens the sample. Hours disappear proving what should already be on the record. Automation closes that gap by turning “please send proof” into “export the packet,” because the decision and its context already live together. 

Under the surface, reviewers are trying to answer five things on every pull. When each answer lives somewhere else, AP reconstructs the story instead of exporting it. 

  • What happened? Invoice plus the exact approval path with names and timestamps. 
  • Why was it allowed? Show that routing followed policy, role, and spend limits and that any exception was approved within the Controller’s documented materiality and tolerances. 
  • Was it received and matched? Tie to the PO and receiving and note how exceptions were resolved. 
  • Did the vendor record change and who verified it? Show who verified banking edits, when, and how. 
  • When did cash clear? Payment details that trace to the same record and reconcile to the ERP’s subledger and GL. 

That’s the root of the scramble: the story lives in pieces. When the decision, the context, and the record travel together, those five answers are already attached to the work. 

What faster, cleaner looks like in practice 

This isn’t about sprinting in January. It’s about keeping the decision, the context, and the record together all year so evidence is ready on demand. 

A clean packet includes the invoice image, approval history with names and timestamps, two or three-way match to the PO and receiving, vendor change history with verifier and date, payment details, and a simple trail of who did what and why. Because the workflow, documents, and payment status live in one place, the export is an action, not a scavenger hunt. 

Here’s how a typical pull looks when the groundwork is set.  

Mid-January at 10:15 a.m., the auditor requests 25 paid invoices from November with approvals and match proof. AP pastes the IDs into a saved view. Each record already shows the approval path and match status. Packets export to a dated folder, with a short note that maps each field to its source. The reply goes back before lunch. 

The payoff shows up quickly. Close becomes more predictable because readiness is visible, not assumed. Conversations get shorter and clearer. Late-night reconstruction fades out. 

Why this raises the bar for Controllers 

Two forces keep the pressure high.  

Off-channel approvals and rising email volume make it too easy for “looks good” to sit in the wrong place. That’s also the surface cybercriminals target with business email compromise. 

Expectations for evidence also keep rising. Packets need to be clean, complete, and aligned to your internal control design so they tell one story from request to payment. 

That’s the shift for controllers. It isn’t about heroics. It’s about an operating model where approvals, support, and payment status align to policy, materiality, and reconciliations the first time, every time. 

The shift: from reconstruction to readiness 

Teams that move quickly don’t push harder in January. They run a steady cadence that keeps decisions visible and evidence connected to the work. 

One path to a decision.
Route by policy and spend limits. If there’s an override, capture the reason and stamp it on the record. Keep status visible so nothing stalls quietly.
Automation applies the rule every time, shows status, and escalates without a chase. 

Linked support, one record.
Keep the invoice, coding, comments, match status, and payment confirmation together. When AP pays, the packet’s basically written. Your AP system becomes the single version of record that syncs cleanly to the ERP, which reduces reconciling items during the close.
 

Deliberate vendor hygiene.
Require documents for adds and edits. Verify bank changes with two people and log who verified, when, and how. A vendor-change workflow collects proof, enforces the check, and logs the activity. That’s good control design and clean evidence in one move.
 

Light weekly hygiene.
Spend fifteen minutes on exceptions and unmatched POs with named owners and short SLAs. Saved views and simple dashboards show what’s stuck so you can clear it fast. Small routines prevent year-end pileups and
protect materiality thresholds from last-minute surprises. 

With that cadence in place, handoffs get simple because the groundwork never slips. 

What leadership actually sees 

This isn’t just an audit story. It’s a control and timing story that shows up where a CFO pays attention. 

Close you can plan around.
Visibility into “ready to pay” tightens accruals and shrinks variance to plan. Forecast reviews shift from caveats to decisions because the ground truth is clear.
 

Audit hours under control.
Standard packets turn in hours, which cuts re-performing the same work and avoids sample expansion. Updates get shorter because answers arrive with evidence, not explanation. The packet exports from the system, not from someone’s inbox.
 

Working capital that behaves.
Policy-backed timing means discounts land more often and late fees are rare.
DPO targets become intentional, not accidental. Treasury gets timing it can plan around. 

Risk posture that holds up.
Least-privilege access, two-person vendor banking verification, and logged approvals make answers defensible by design. Those controls are easy to explain and easier to test.
 

Capacity back to analysis.
When context lives with the invoice and saved views power PBC pulls, the team stops chasing screenshots. Hours shift to exception reduction, vendor rationalization, and spend insights leadership can act on.
 

To make those outcomes your norm, tighten a few everyday routines. 

Five moves to make this month 

Pick one or two and get them done. Small, visible wins change the story fast. 

  • Keep approvals on the record. If one arrives by email, attach it and add a short comment. Most AP systems let you pin the message. 
  • Standardize names and tags. Use your platform’s fields so searches and exports are consistent. 
  • Verify vendor banking with two people. Make it a workflow step with required evidence and a simple log. 
  • Save two views for January. Paid invoices with approvals by date range, and a vendor change report with before-and-after fields. Schedule the export. 
  • Run a 10-item dry run. Time it, find gaps, and fix them now using the same saved view you’ll rely on later. 

Put those practices in play and the next request unfolds very differently. 

A faster, cleaner January, in practice 

Picture that same ask one more time. The auditor requests 25 paid invoices with approvals and match proof. In a scattered world, that sparks screenshots, file renames, and follow-ups. With these habits in place, you paste the IDs into a saved view, approvals and match are already attached, packets export cleanly, a short note maps fields, and the email goes out before lunch. 

Accruals reflect reality because “ready to pay” is clear. Discounts land because approvals move on schedule. Month-end reads like a checklist, not a coin flip. 

Make faster, cleaner the default 

Faster, cleaner audits aren’t a January miracle. They come from clean data, visible decisions, and processes that keep evidence tied to the work. Keep the decision on the record. Tie support to the same place. Clear small backlogs every week. When the request lands, the answer goes back quickly, fees stay contained, and the close stays calm. 

AP automation locks those practices in by keeping approvals on the record, linking documents to the same transaction, and turning audit pulls into exports.  

If you want that to be the default, take the next step with Confident Decisions, Every Time: How Automation Transforms AP Policy Management.” It shows how embedding policy in the workflow turns gray-area approvals, missing POs, and vendor onboarding gaps into consistent, documented decisions that stand up in audit and keep work moving.